One thing to keep in mind is reading the actual article is actually more informative than the lefty blurbs and huzzahs of these blogs celebrating a blow against the RIAA.
Also I'm taken aback at the fact that there are four layers of blogs before one can actually find the original article. People on the internet are lazy as a rule but this kind of egregious laziness is beyond the pale.
Yes, I understand that this is hardly new but I don't have much in the way of material for this edition of heptapod.org.
It's good for the attacker because there's a better chance of getting a lower number than the defender. It's good for the defender because then there's a chance they'll roll 1 and 1 making them undefeatable. In such a circumstance where the attacker and the defender roll two ones then the win goes to the defender.
Since I'm an idiot and not a statistician, I'm certain this mechanic would be considered unbalanced and not make for a fun game.